Skip to content

bugsnag: emit slice_name from service_name in custom metadata tab#267

Open
morgan-wowk wants to merge 1 commit into
bugsnag-error-chainfrom
bugsnag/service-slice
Open

bugsnag: emit slice_name from service_name in custom metadata tab#267
morgan-wowk wants to merge 1 commit into
bugsnag-error-chainfrom
bugsnag/service-slice

Conversation

@morgan-wowk

@morgan-wowk morgan-wowk commented May 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Some Bugsnag stacks filter on custom.slice_name to assign errors to
a slice. Store the service_name passed to setup() and write it as
custom.slice_name on every event so errors from orchestrator, api, and
metrics_poller each land in their own slice.

Consolidates all custom tab writes into a single add_tab call.

morgan-wowk commented May 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Comment thread cloud_pipelines_backend/instrumentation/bugsnag_instrumentation.py
Comment thread cloud_pipelines_backend/instrumentation/bugsnag_instrumentation.py
Comment thread tests/instrumentation/test_bugsnag.py
Observe error analytics filters on custom.slice_name to assign errors to
a slice. Store the service_name passed to setup() and write it as
custom.slice_name on every event so errors from orchestrator, api, and
metrics_poller each land in their own slice.

Consolidates all custom tab writes into a single add_tab call.
@morgan-wowk morgan-wowk force-pushed the bugsnag/service-slice branch from 4730f88 to e6a36dc Compare June 10, 2026 20:52
@morgan-wowk morgan-wowk force-pushed the bugsnag-error-chain branch from 563c451 to 035ad1f Compare June 10, 2026 20:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants